[Tribune7]

It has become just another lousy contract that can be broken and resumed as long as the gov’t says so, at least for many.

That's a very good point. I said this before but civil marriage has absolutely nada to do with love.

In fact, if civil marriage was about love there would be no need for it.

[Ransomed]

“I said this before but civil marriage has absolutely nada to do with love.”

Well, I perhaps wouldn’t go so far, but I can see where you are coming from. I will say that the determination of whether or not two people are married isn’t decided with a piece of paper from the state, just like a law saying the moon is made of cheese isn’t the deciding factor as to what the moon actually is made of. Although the statists and homosexualists love that state recognition of marriage is actually the deciding factor for many if two people are married.

Freegards