Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Bronze Titan

Big difference: Exxon, Conoco Phillips, BP etcetera DO NOT OWN A DROP OF OIL in Alaska.

It is all owned by the people of Alaska,and they can drive whatever bargain they want when they sell it to the oil companies. It’s called free trade.

In the lower 48, the great majority of mineral rights were sold long ago, not so in Alaska, where mineral rights, with few exceptions, were never sold, and are retained (according to the Alaska Constitution) by the citizens of Alaska.


56 posted on 08/22/2011 10:00:14 AM PDT by cookcounty (Obama: "Relax. I'm fittin' to start to commence to begin to write a rough draft of a plan.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cookcounty; hosepipe
Here is a good consultant report on Alaska's oil that covers all the current debate and angles on how to best to use that oil as their state's resource.

Several points to consider when interjecting "Alaska Oil" and "Sarah Palin"...

- Sarah Palin single-handedly took a confirmed "corrupt" state industry (comprised of capitalist and government forces), and turned it on it's head by reforming it's revenue structure and providing public transparency to be benefit of it's citizens. That cannot be disputed.

- Sarah Palin took this effort in the right direction. The legislation as "ACES". Was it "PERFECT"? No, because nothing in this world is (except the exceptional "Diamond"). But, she she did REVERSE THINGS in the right direction as far as it was politically possible.

- The "ALASKA CONSTITUTION" (unlike those of other states) proclaims the "oil" (i.e. "minerals") to be the property of the State/Citizens. This makes the STATE/CITIZENS the "OWNER" of the oil (Mineral), and so they become the "SELLER" of this oil. As the "Seller" they (STATE) get to decide "WHO" they sell to (Leases) and "HOW MUCH" to charge (call them "Fees", "Taxes", "Charges" less "Credits", "Tax Breaks", etc...), and to what "END" they apply these "REVENUES" (Dividend Checks / Savings applied to future obligations "DEBT", etc...).

- As the "OWNER" of this Oil, the STATE needs to make sure that they get the best return on their ASSET, but at the same time being mindful that you need to have competitive incentives for private industry to INVEST and DEVELOP this resource for the longterm. This is what the current debate is about. See the Report just commissioned this year issued by 'Commonwealth North'.

Report by Commonwealth North

74 posted on 08/22/2011 10:44:35 AM PDT by The Bronze Titan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: cookcounty

Exactly. In Alaska, they pay the oil companies 75% of the value of the oil for the rudimentary task of getting it out of the ground.

I think the rate ought to be 25% with the rest going directly to Alaska citizens.


204 posted on 08/31/2011 1:23:51 AM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson