“What are you talking about , my post makes the same point you do”
Maybe I misinterpreted this part of your post:
“one realizes a lot of ballot stuffing went on”
That sounds to me as if you think Paul’s supporters resorted to illegal measures to skew the results. “Ballot stuffing” generally is a reference to illegal acts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballot_stuffing
I was simply saying I think Paul got his vote count fair and square through out-hustling the opposition, as opposed to rigging the results.