Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ontap

I actually think that the legislation is constitutional on the basis of protecting our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. That argument doesn’t apply, however, to any non-firearms related tort legislation that Congress attempts to pass at the federal level. That should be the province of states.


37 posted on 08/22/2011 4:43:50 AM PDT by 10thAmendmentGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: 10thAmendmentGuy

I agree!!


41 posted on 08/22/2011 4:54:02 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson