>>Wow, you are defending possession of child porn as long as no “deed” is done. You disgust me.<<
I’d disgust me too, if that is what I was doing. It’s not.
All I am saying is they are two different things. Related but different. And different in seriousness.
I’ve been pretty clear here. You are letting your emotions cloud your logic. Or are you female, which would explain that? This is, after all, a pretty emotional issue, and this explains our failure to communicate on this particular issue:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BxckAMaTDc
How interesting, you’re a misogynist and you think possession of child porn is ok.
And yes, I am a female.
Hope they rip your balls off child porn zot. Oops, guess my emotions got the better of me.
Not VERY different, really, dude. The possession of child porn is a predicative infraction to acts of harm. Also, the creation of the porn requires and encourages acts of harm. The difference, while slight, is there.
Jean, dunno if I'd say he's defending child porn, entirely.
If the someone was accused of Murder, but really should be accused of Manslaughter, it's not defending the act of killing people to properly identify the STILL VERY SERIOUS charge,
Okay, yes, it’s a moot point. RobRoy is dead.