Posted on 08/21/2011 6:23:01 AM PDT by Anamnesis
Born February 11, 1964 in Sandpoint, ID (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)
Parents were
Charles R Heath, born in ID
Sarah Sheeran, born in WI
Both parents were US Citizens at the time of her birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)
Sarah Palin is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama ISN'T!
uptop4later
Sarah needs to state in simple terms her position on illegal immigration. Her lack of a forthcoming statement leaves me wondering just WHAT her position really happens to be. She is rated a D+, while Perry has a D- rating, meanwhile Bachmann is rated a B+........
How DARE you! Whatever the position, it's perfect. That is all you need to know.
do I really need the /s?
If you can't donate, click here join now to organize and help.
There are serious difficulties with that “rating” system by numbersUSA.
1) They are judging Sarah based on comments she made while under the yolk of Amnesty McCain. She did her level best to be ambiguous and refer to what a President Amnesty McCain would do, but she is being tarred by that.
2) There is no basis for the ratings. NumbersUSA provides what the breakdowns topic breakdowns are, but not what makes a D a minus instead of a plus. IIRC, they do not tie to specific positions, they are subjective.
3) Their positions are way beyond where 90% of even conservatives would go. Their focus is not limited to protecting the border, deporting illegals, denying illegals benefits, and enforcing the law. I don’t recall the specifics now, but I doubt even Tom Tancredo would get better than a B on their scale. They openly admit their scale is rigid and harsh.
That was the other thing that bothered me. There is less difference between Bachmann and Palin on their chart (using their criteria) than there is between Perry and Palin, and yet Palin is listed much closer to Perry.
Look it up, their system is not a valid barometer. I do agree though, she needs to come out forcefully against illegal immigration and this backdoor amnesty.
(((((PING)))))
No, you didn’t really need the /s tag, but the nice thing is I am no longer being flamed for asking this question...
My fear is she is a NWO follower...
If Sarah is NWO, there are no real Americans left. That includes you and me!
From Palin haters:
Dec 3, 2009
LARS: The amnesty proposal that was defeated in Congress — in your view, was that amnesty for illegals and would you back amnesty for a path to citizenship, as the current president calls it?
SARAH PALIN: No, I’m not for amnesty. Let’s ratchet this down quite simply to remember what we’re referring to. Illegal aliens are called “illegal” for a reason. We need to secure our borders and I am not for amnesty. And there are humane ways to deal with the 11-13 million illegal aliens who are in our country right now, but if they’re not going to follow the rules, they need to get out.
http://www.laprogressive.com/immigration-reform/sarah-palin-immigration/
Sarah Palin Tells Bill O’Reilly What She Would Do About Immigration As ‘President Palin’
July 14, 2010
Last Friday, Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly asked former Gov. Sarah Palin; (R-AK) what she would do about immigration if she ever became “President Palin.” Palin informed O’Reilly that she would do “whatever it takes” to secure the border, including “militarizing” the border with 10,000-15,000 National Guard troops and building a wall.
However, Palin seemed less confident about what to do about the millions of undocumented immigrants already living in the U.S. She proposed requiring undocumented immigrations to register with the federal government in order to legally work in the United States — a step that would actually be part of comprehensive immigration reform:
O’REILLY: Now we have 12 million people staring at you. Are you going to deport them, what are you going to do?
PALIN: You’re not gonna give them a free pass. You’re not gonna say, ‘okay you and anyone else who wants scurry across this porous border between now and when we do
finally get it fenced in and physically secured — we’re gonna give you a free pass.’
O’REILLY: So no amnesty?
PALIN: No amnesty! Do we make them register with the federal government? Yes!
Let’s keep it simple and let’s say ‘no, if you were here illegally and if you don’t follow the steps that at some point through immigration reform we’re gonna be able to provide — and that is somehow to allow you to work — if you don’t do that, then you’re gonna be gone.’
Other Side:
http://www.teapartybrewing.com/blog/2011/07/26/numbersusa-fail-in-evaluating-sarah-palin/
Sunday, July 24, 2011
NumbersUSA Fail in evaluating Sarah Palin
(Video of full interview at link)
Whoever did the evaluation on Sarah Palin got it wrong at NumbersUSA. I compared their conclusions with what was said in the Gov. Palin interview with Bill O’Reilly, 12 July 2010.
NumbersUSA: “Despite saying she opposes ‘amnesty,’ Gov. Palin has very publicly described her preference for giving legal status to masses of illegal aliens.”
>There are no references to back up what NumbersUSA say Palin said. Where exactly has Palin made such a statement?
NumbersUSA: “Gov. Palin has said she opposes amnesty and there should be ‘no free passes’ for illegal aliens. However, she seems to define amnesty like most supporters
of legalization of illegal aliens.
>Here NumbersUSA refuse Palin’s words “no free passes” and insert what they want to portray her as “seeming” to be like other amnesty supporters.
NumbersUSA: “Palin has outlined a pathway to legalization where illegal aliens have 60 days to register with the government (those that fail to register should be deported).
Palin does not have a clear idea of what to do once illegal aliens have registered, but if illegal aliens do not follow the path to legalization, they should be deported.
>The above statement is false. At 1:35 O’Reilly makes an hypothetical statement, “Do you tell them they have 60 days to get outta here?” Palin did not make an outline of 60 days.
NumbersUSA: “Gov. Palin has made it clear that the United States needs a steady flow of immigrants in order for our economy to function.
>I don’t see how Numbers can make this statement. I can’t find Palin saying anything about supporting a steady flow of immigrants anywhere in the interview.
After reading Numbers USA evaluation, I can’t find NumbersUSA to be a credible source.
Until these errors are corrected, NumbersUSA grades an F.
The antiPalins on FR feed on blatant lies and regurgitate them equally regardless of R or D.
I’m waiting for the first antiSP freeper to announce they’ve played her speeches backward and discovered satanic messages...perhaps along with recipes for deviled caribou...snerk ;)
LOL. It's coming the PDS is stong.
Plain needs to make a concise and clear statement that leaves no doubt that where she stands....
How much clearer can you get than *anything it takes to close the border* and *NO amnesty?* Is that too ambiguous for you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.