Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ExtremeUnction

The problem might be, the homeowner instinctively requesting to secure the dog...Knowing they’d shot the dog otherwise.


18 posted on 08/19/2011 8:38:43 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


Shoot too!


19 posted on 08/19/2011 8:39:46 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: dragnet2

No.

If that is true you are sincerely f#@cked if you have a pet.

Mentioning the dog is to not have the police shoot the dog because they then can’t be surprised by it.

If you don’t mention it they can shoot it because they didn’t know it was there and it surprisedthem. If you do mention it by your logic they’ll shoot it because you want to lock it up.

They can’t have it both ways. Then there’s no way for you to be able to protect your animal.

And believe me, they do this to other animals. I still remember the female police officer who kicked the family cat across a room and said you’re lucky I didn’t shoot it.


36 posted on 08/19/2011 9:30:29 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson