No, there is no date or anything.
The ONLY THING I am saying is that the COINCIDENCE of the DISCOVERER’S NAME and the 2 BASIC FACTORS about the Comet is HIGHLY UNLIKELY, therefore NOT BELIEVABLE.
That is all.
There IS a Comet, I believe, following the trajectory published by NASA and JPL.
We also know that for the past 2 weeks NASA has pointed STEREO B (solar observatory behind the earth orbital track) directly at the Comet for 2 HOURS per day.
If it was as INSIGNIFICANT as they say, why did they do this?
I just don’t believe the STORY about it’s DISCOVERY.
THAT makes me generally suspicious about what is said through official channels about it.
How can you explain the coincidence?
It is pretty unlikely, you’d have to agree, wouldn’t you?
Is that clear enough for you?
Cut to the quick. What is the purpose of this thread?
Yeah, since I've been debunking this stuff (same s@#t, different date) since 2009, I'd say it's clear to me.
But unlike you and your ilk, I keep track of this stuff.
So unless you've come up with something different in the last few days, spare me your ad hominem attacks, because I've seen them all.