I’m quite aware of Sharia’s incompatibility with Democracy. I asked whether the appointee had shown any inclination to impose Sharia.
If a Muslim will lie (taqqiya) to pretend to be a Christian (conversos), and any moderate Muslim is just a lying or repressed terrorist, then we have to kill them all before they all kill us first?
Judge the man by his fruits. Even the Spanish during the era of the inquisition permitted Muslims to serve in high offices. If he is feigning, his record will speak for itself; even the Spanish looked to actions committed by the conversos to infer that they were practicing taqqiya. I’m not saying that this guy belongs in the court; I’m ASKING whether there’s any reason to keep him off the court.
It doesn’t make any difference whether ‘the appointee had shown any inclination to impose Sharia’ or not.
Repeat:
‘Every “moderate” Muslim is a potential terrorist. The belief in Islam is like a tank of gasoline. It looks innocuous, until it meets the fire. For a “moderate” Muslim to become a murderous jihadist, all it takes is a spark of faith.’
Ali Sina
We do NOT need Muslims in our government!!
.