Yes, it is “ethical” to do away, legally, with sweetheart deals made by corrupt politicians in exchange for campaign funds and whatnot - to make sure the OWNERS of the natural resources (the people of Alaska) receive a more equitable share of the profits from the selling of what they own.
Now if you don't think the people of Alaska should own natural resources - who do you think should own it? How would this be determined and who would profit?
well hot dang! using that reasoning, EVERYTHING should be redistributed to “the people” !
hm... wait... that’s called communism.