Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: South40

In 2009, the idea that is might be more dangerous was publicized. But, as of 2007, it was vetted by the board we use to vet drugs. So at the time of the EO, with the information available, it was not unproven.

Also, the article you linked says that a person at a conference took the researcher’s promotion of the the vaccine to be negative, and specifically stated that the lead researcher did not offer that suggestion. 1/3 of the article showed the lead researcher to say that HPV is not as serious as it is portrayed, and unless 70% of girls get the vaccine, it will be hard to determine the results. The last 1/3 is pure speculation. The article also appears to be on a Catholic website, written in the point of view that the author was against Gardasil before doing any research. A quick Google search shows there is strong opposition to Gardasil within the Catholic community, so the objectivity of this report is questionable.

The other point I was making was in reference to the post before it, which was complaining of mandated “unproven” vaccines. I addressed the “unproven” aspect first. Then I addressed the mandated aspect. Its not my fault you didnt see the context in your own post.


143 posted on 08/17/2011 8:48:08 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: Raider Sam
In 2009, the idea that is might be more dangerous was publicized. But, as of 2007, it was vetted by the board we use to vet drugs. So at the time of the EO, with the information available, it was not unproven.

You really are desperate. Using that warped logic, Thalidomide was proven.

Fact: Gardasil is unproven in that the effectiveness and the side effects are still unknown.

Fact: Dr. Harper said that "with the use of Gardasil, there will be no decrease in cervical cancer until at least 70% of the population is vaccinated,

Fact: Dr. Harper's comments in an ABC News report concur with the National Vaccine Information Center's claim that "...a whopping 89 percent of the reports Merck did file were so incomplete there was not enough information for health officials to do a proper follow-up and review.

You're free to continue your hopeless cause of denying the obvious but I will not allow you to waste any more of my time. This drug is unproven by any definition of the word and a researcher who helped develop it along with the National Vaccine Information Center both agree. Bye

145 posted on 08/17/2011 9:23:24 PM PDT by South40 (Primaries are about choosing a conservative candidate, not settling on a Rove RINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson