Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

She couldn’t get 35 votes in the Ames poll because she didn’t want any votes in the Ames poll. Getting votes for pay wasn’t of any interest to her. It did Pawlenty a lot of good didn’t it, wasting the last dimes of his campaign money on meaningless votes. Your argument is one of the weakest I have ever seen. One thing I do agree with is , it doesn’t matter.


108 posted on 08/17/2011 8:12:24 AM PDT by curth (Sarah Palin: THE Genuine Article - Accept No Cheap Imitation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: curth
If there is such a DEMAND for Palin, there should have been such a clamor to vote for her, they wouldn't have been able to pay them to stay away.

The fact is there was a write-in line on the ballot, don't you think that if the demand is like you claim, there should have been more than 35 write ins for Palin out of almost 17,000 cast. Anyone desiring to vote for Palin could have gotten a free ticket from one of the other campaigns or groups offering free tickets. No one's free ticket came with someone watching over the voters' shoulder to see how they voted.

Besides, if you had been an Iowan Sat., wouldn't you have been willing to part with $30.00 to support Sarah?

I was SHOCKED that she received no more than 35 votes, I would never have predicted that. It reinforces the point, there is no demand for Palin to run for president. People like her and respect her, they just don't want her to run for president.

We must defeat Obama.

111 posted on 08/17/2011 8:31:53 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson