>> Maybe the ‘system’ should be changed so the ADMITTEDLY
>> guilty condemn themselves-bypassing the expenses incurred >> defending them against facts. My opinion.
I understand your emotions. However, there is a reason for our system and the due process.
There was a time and a place in history where “ADMITTEDLY guilty condemned themselves” to death, spectacularly, in front of a staged “judges” and court “audience”.
They condemned themselves because they were coerced to by mental physical torture, and or torture, or threat of torture to their family members.
That place was Stalin’s USSR.
Which is why we have a due process for even the most heinous, confessed criminals.
It used to be that justice was swift in these cases. He would be fried within a few weeks if this was a few years ago. He confessed. The British papers have the gory details that our pussified papers refuse to share.