Posted on 08/14/2011 6:43:36 AM PDT by tobyhill
Rick Perry, who entered the 2012 GOP race Saturday, greeted his first crowd of voters here with two words rarely heard in these parts: with a wave, he let out a boisterous Hi, yall to a crowd clad in khakis and button ups gathered around a backyard pool.
There was also this: Yall holler outta question to open up a question and answer session.
And this when it got going: Theres hands going up everywhere, somebody just get after it.
There were times when the three-term Texas governor sounded eerily like the Saturday Night Live version of George W. Bush, droppin every g and proclaiming awesome at nothing in particular.
His appearance raised the question that is at the center of his candidacy: Can Perry take his Texas twang on the road and meet voters where they live, in cities and suburbs and swing states?
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
You say I'm wrong. Prove it. Do a comparison of housing costs in NYC compared to San Antonio. Do a comparison of wages in LA compared to those in El Paso.
Well, that's more that news to me. Please point out where I stated that. You don't have to be snarky with me because you don't know what his duties are. Here, I'll give you the link from Perry's own site so you'll understand it better:
http://www.governor.state.tx.us/about/duties
Now, compare those to the lt. gov. office and tell me who the real workhorse is. For your convenience, here's Dewhurst's duties:
http://www.ltgov.state.tx.us/duties.php
That leaves Palin, Perry and Santorum.
I want someone who will kick obozo out of office and I haven't written Perry off yet, apparently you have and that is your right.
Your punctuation guidance is only out paced by your ability to “Talk all day and not say a word”!
“They called him the pit bull because he was ruthless at cutting things from the budget.”
Another plus!! That’s what we need to get this out of control spending back in control!
“We need to get rid of Obama, but we don’t need George Bush’s third term. The second was difficult enough to stomach.”
No thanks.
You said I was wrong so I asked you to prove it but you declined. Low and behold, here's a thread from this afternoon from Forbes titled, "The Next Big Boom Towns in the U.S." which you can find over in the sidebar:
"Of course, Texas metropolitan areas feature prominently on our list of future boom towns, including No. 4 San Antonio, No. 5 Houston and No. 7 Dallas, which over the past years boasted the biggest jump in new jobs, over 83,000. Aided by relatively low housing prices and buoyant economies, these Lone Star cities have become major hubs for jobs and families. And there's more growth to come. With its strategically located airport, Dallas is emerging as the ideal place for corporate relocations. And Houston, with its burgeoning port and dominance of the world energy business, seems destined to become ever more influential in the coming decade. Both cities have emerged as major immigrant hubs, attracting on newcomers at a rate far higher than old immigrant hubs like Chicago, Boston and Seattle.... Los Angeles' once huge and vibrant industrial sector has shrunk rapidly, in large part the consequence of ever-tightening regulatory burdens. Its once magnetic appeal to educated migrants faded and families are fleeing from persistently high housing prices, poor educational choices and weak employment opportunities... Like its other Texas neighbors, San Antonio boasts soaring population rates as well as a good job market and booming industry. One key factor in San Antonio's favor: stable house prices -- even by Texas standards."
Now, who's wrong and who's right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.