[kabar]

Disagree. Bachmann did a great job in her interview. She stayed on message and didn't allow Gregory to define the exchange. Over and over again, she came back to jobs and the economy. This is the way to handle the MSM assassins.

I especially enjoyed the way she handled the appointment of judges and officials in her administration. The issue of whether they were gay or not was of no consequence because the question wouldn't be asked. It wouldn't be one of her criteria.

[gov_bean_ counter]

That was of course the right answer, but Representative Bachmann's personal narrative is going to make that line a tough sell in the general election.

Bottom line is she may not ask, but she will know. (Not saying that is a bad thing, either.)

[txrangerette]

Please see my post 294 for my assessment of her MTP appearance.

kabar, her judge picks comments were great as you say, and she also said to Gregory’s asking if she would appoint an atheist judge, the same exact answer she gave on appointing a gay one.

Their views on the Constitution, their fitness to serve, “and whether they agree with my views”.

Those would be her questions and she would never ask, are you gay, are you an atheist, etc.