To: DRey
Sorry, but none of the top three in this poll has any chance of being the next President of the United States.
6 posted on
08/13/2011 4:07:01 PM PDT by
Patrick1
("The problem with Internet quotations is that many are not genuine." - Abraham Lincoln)
To: Patrick1
You are right , sir . And we don’t want RINOs Perry or Romney . You think Cain has a shot ?
15 posted on
08/13/2011 4:09:15 PM PDT by
sushiman
To: Patrick1
Unfortunately at this time I tend to agree, but curious who you think does have a chance?
21 posted on
08/13/2011 4:11:29 PM PDT by
mojitojoe
( 1400 years of existence & Islam has 2 main accomplishments, psychotic violence and goat curry)
To: Patrick1
Let us hope not. VP, either.
55 posted on
08/13/2011 4:23:10 PM PDT by
Jedidah
(I'll vote for an earthworm before I'll vote for Obama. So wiggle on in, Rick Perry.)
To: Patrick1
And people like you, a defeatest, are why. They said this of Clinton and of Obama, they said it of Bush...If she wins the nom you and had better be fan #1 or else we’re actually the problem for the right in this nation.
58 posted on
08/13/2011 4:24:03 PM PDT by
ICE-FLYER
(God bless and keep the United States of America)
To: Patrick1
Really? I think Pawlenty and Bachmann could both beat Obama by 10 pts. Obama has proven himself unfit for office. Obama possibly would beat Paul, possibly not.
To: Patrick1
Really? I think Pawlenty and Bachmann could both beat Obama by 10 pts. Obama has proven himself unfit for office. Obama possibly would beat Paul, possibly not.
To: Patrick1
Would be great to have Herman Cain and Allen West!
That would really put some folks’ knickers in a twist for sure!
76 posted on
08/13/2011 4:32:13 PM PDT by
tutstar
To: Patrick1
Iowa is a waste of time. The two people who come out ahead were Perry and Palin because they stayed out of it.
81 posted on
08/13/2011 4:36:14 PM PDT by
Melchior
To: Patrick1
I agree. I was really turned off by Pawlenty and I like Bachmann, but I just don’t think she can win. I really like Cain, but he needs to be in the Senate.
To: Patrick1
If mindless media puppets have anything to say about it. you’re probably right...
90 posted on
08/13/2011 4:42:31 PM PDT by
Tempest
(Ruining the day of corporate butt kissers everywhere.)
To: Patrick1
And yet they are all more qualified than OBAMA!!
105 posted on
08/13/2011 4:52:12 PM PDT by
GeorgeTex
(Obama-Four M President (Mendacious Manchurian Muslim Marxist))
To: Patrick1
>Sorry, but none of the top three in this poll has any chance of being the next President of the United States.<
You don’t think Bachmann stands a chance?
Can you elaborate or articulate why?
226 posted on
08/13/2011 6:09:50 PM PDT by
Munz
(All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
To: Patrick1
I agree with you..I see politicians there, not patriots.
To: Patrick1
I agree with you..I see politicians there, not patriots.
To: Patrick1
"Sorry, but none of the top three in this poll has any chance of being the next President of the United States. "
Right out of the libtard playbook...keep repeating a lie often and long enough and it will be accepted as truth. Well, Americans are on to your dubious tactics. Thank you, Lord! And I'll be you really are sorry a real conservative took this poll by a landslide against the RINOs.
339 posted on
08/14/2011 5:33:14 AM PDT by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: Patrick1
Sorry, but none of the top three in this poll has any chance of being the next President of the United States.Why? Because the media tells us so? Because we listen to them even though we are fully aware that they will lie, steal, and bully us to support their socialist standard bearers in both parties?
I make no such suppositions. It's sad how much we allow ourselves to be manipulated by the ministry of propaganda.
369 posted on
08/14/2011 10:55:15 AM PDT by
zeugma
(The only thing in the social security trust fund is your children and grandchildren's sweat.)
To: Patrick1
The establishment said that about Reagan in ‘76 and in ‘80. People fell for it in ‘76 so we ended up with Carter. In ‘80 the people went against the establishment, nominated Reagan, and we won by a landslide.
Bachmann 2012 = Morning in America
372 posted on
08/14/2011 11:04:11 AM PDT by
SUSSA
To: Patrick1
That is what was said about Reagan and this polls significance is that Romney won’t be crowned and Bachmann is doing very well in debates and she is resignating people wanting real change.
376 posted on
08/14/2011 12:57:48 PM PDT by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(It is possible to both promote Palin and support Bachmann at the same time, ya know.)
To: Patrick1
I’d be very happy with Michelle Bachman as President.
401 posted on
08/15/2011 12:46:15 AM PDT by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson