oh, please. red herring argument. negativity throughout your answer. I am not buying, nice try though.
So a recap:
Me: factual statement 1, factual statement 2, factual statement 3, factual statement 4, factual statement 5, application and conclusion. Each of the 5 can be further supported through history if necessary.
You: I don’t like your argument because it is “negative” even though I can’t actually point to anything specifically wrong in what you said so I will just say I’m not buying it.
Thanks for the great counter-argument.