Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JimWayne

Over the years I have watched in horror as the other women in my family have chosen to vote solely on the attractiveness of Presidntial candidates.
I have come to realize this tendency is real and appallingly common. The founding fathers denied women the right to vote for a reason and this is the reason!

Add to this the fact that past elections have always been won by the tallest candidate, and you understand why Paul simply will never be the nominee, no matter how sound his ideas may be.

Attractiveness shouldn’t matter so much, but it does and we have to win this election based on that reality and not idealism.

Frankly, a vote for Paul is a vote for Obama. He would even be a drag as the VP choice.


138 posted on 08/13/2011 3:24:48 PM PDT by Wiser now (Socialism is the greed of the poor and the polticians who exploit them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wiser now
Frankly, a vote for Paul is a vote for Obama.

I disagree. A vote for the surrender monkey is a vote NOT going to Obama. No Republican would ever vote for an anti-American like cut and run.
141 posted on 08/13/2011 3:29:43 PM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: Wiser now

Oh, please. Like the men salivating over Sarah Palin are just SO thoughtful about their voting choices.


198 posted on 08/15/2011 7:42:20 PM PDT by Politicalmom ("President Fox's vision for an open border is a vision I embrace"- Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson