[BfloGuy]

I would only call it "dishonest" if the author were misrepresenting it to prove that wind was a viable energy source. He isn't. He's using it to illustrate that wind provides its lowest amount of power at peak demand and vice versa.

I'll grant you it's poorly designed.

[cc2k]

The inadquacy of wind power would have been even more obvious if the scale were the same for both lines. Or at least if there were an obvious break and it didn’t appear that the lines overlapped when they clearly don’t come close.