I’m interesting in Perry. This is what I see the left saying so far:
1) He had bad grades.
2) His job creation is all low-wage jobs.
3) Conservatives in Texas have bad things to say about him.
“Bad grades” don’t bother me one whit, considering the trashing of America by all the Ivy League types that weasel their way into national politics. Palin/Perry or Perry/Rubio for the GOP national ticket.
Another Romney
They all have flaws, it is still going to be voting for the lesser of 2 evils. We can choose the least socialistic of the batch, but we will be the ones who have to be united on a candidate. The demwits don’t have to.
The person who goes up against 0 will have to have charisma, tv appeal, which means a decent set of choppers to smile not grimace at you, not sound dull as a droning professor, and has some fire in their belly, and a touch of the old time preacher man. Along with their facts straight.
And they better have a clean childhood, because the FBI has been busy digging dirt on all of them at 0’s command, which he will drop on the right Friday nights.
Until you start hearing the Reform word, and placing congress people under Medicare, instead of their life time platinum health care, and make them live under the same exact laws they foist on you, they will remain your Lord and Masters, and you the SERF with an open wallet to rape.
Force them to replace the SS funds they stole too. And fix it so they can’t raid it again.
1) He had bad grades.
2) His job creation is all low-wage jobs.
3) Conservatives in Texas have bad things to say about him.
Maybe that’s why he won last nights debate. He escaped the platform where he’d have been asked those questions. ;)
It’s deceptive to consider those who did not attend the debate the winners. It’s not winning to avoid debates so that you can avoid questions. Deceptive yes, but not winning. Unless of course you’re Charlie Sheen.
How soon they forget that Perry was once a Democrat and backed Al Gore in the 1988 primaries.