Some here presume he used dope ~ yet the articles say he was into mental health programs.
The cops knew all about this guy ~ darned shame he was allowed to pull the trigger on his shotgun.
No. WE don’t know yet.
But, his ‘track record’ has nothing to do with this incident.
I’m not saying the guy doesn’t deserve to fry, but you can’t apply what he did in the past with what may or may not have transpired in this incident.
Each case should be judged on ‘evidence’. Not supposition.
None of the articles I have read on ‘this’ case states what the ‘domestic disturbance’ was.
Notice, it didn’t say ‘domestic violence’ which would ‘presuppose’ it to mean wife, or another person being battered or assaulted.
Like I said. I hope the guy fries. But let’s not start convicting people based on ‘past’ cases.
Under the law, each case must be investigated and tried on it’s own merit.