So ‘exigent circumstances’ nullifies Amendment 4.
So, basically what you are saying is that the application of the 4th is really up to a judge?
So I guess the Constitution is really ‘open to interpretation’ depending on the circumstances then.
And here I thought what the Forefathers wrote is what they meant.
I guess I was a fool for believing that.
Does the 4th amendment mean I can rob a bank and then run home and lock my door and they can’t come in and get me?
It doesn’t?
WHY NOT?
What, are you saying there are EXCEPTIONS!!!!
I’m calling Ron Paul on you!
Quit being an hysterical ninny and go do some research. I don’t have the time or the inclination to deal with someone who refuses to learn anything and goes on silly rants.