To: americanophile
Point conceded, but still best to have a single thread to aggregate comments, IMHO.
13 posted on
08/12/2011 10:54:25 AM PDT by
null and void
(Day 932. The mob is decisive when the law is not.)
To: null and void
Ya, okay...I generally agree.
15 posted on
08/12/2011 10:56:31 AM PDT by
americanophile
("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives" - Ataturk)
To: null and void; americanophile
Point conceded, but still best to have a single thread to aggregate comments, IMHO. However, the thread you're pointing to is locked, so noone's going to post comments there anyway.
60 posted on
08/12/2011 11:42:36 AM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(Obama is the least qualified guy in whatever room he walks into.)
To: null and void; americanophile
If it had been a single thread I never would have seen it. I like duplicates.
113 posted on
08/12/2011 1:03:01 PM PDT by
LouAvul
To: null and void
Point conceded, but still best to have a single thread to aggregate comments, IMHO.We need a format that brings a thread back to the top when a new comment is made. This keeps hot topics hot, and let's exhausted threads work there way down naturally. Also eliminates duplicate threads.
Not criticizing...just sayin'.
153 posted on
08/12/2011 3:16:52 PM PDT by
Bronzewound
(When radicals begin to follow rules, are they still radicals?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson