Maybe I’ll be paying for it, but its cheaper than paying for the offspring.
The estimated cost of delivery alone is $6,000 – $8,000 for a low risk pregnancy, and the cost increases if it is a high risk pregnancy.
http://www.americanpregnancy.org/planningandpreparing/affordablehealthcare.html
the personal cost of birth control ranges from $10 to $100 or more a month
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/04/14/contraception-cost-birth-control-pills-craigslist/
You do the math.
Bama’s mama should have practiced some control.
Well all won’t be using it..Your welfare moms will not use because that would mean welfare checks will stop..When they stop having babies to pay for their drug habits and extras they want, then I would say yes pay for it if it will really be used for the people that keep popping out babies for money.. My question here isn’t the birth control already free in the clinic and some schools ..
We pay out-of-pocket, without insurance co-pay, just under $20 per month. No big deal. If the government is going to get involved, their only interest should be in making sure that all welfare women are on the pill as a condition of receiving benefits.
I am all for it. This is one example of taxpayers money well spent. An ounce of protection is worth a pound of cure.
Well I see it this way...women of child berating age will find it much harder to find a job as soon as the insurance company informs employers it will cost them more by employing them because of this.We will soon see companions only hire women who are over 40 and not much chance they will need this for too many more years.
Well I see it this way...women of child bearing age will find it much harder to find a job as soon as the insurance company informs employers it will cost them more by employing them because of this.We will soon see companions only hire women who are over 40 and not much chance they will need this for too many more years.
The most effective birth control the government could offer would be to remove the wealth transfer to those who scam the system by having as many children as possible just for the free money.
A classic line of proponents of universal health care -”When free health care comes around, then I could feel safe and comfortable asking for the best health care, with the best doctors there are int he best hospitals providing the fastest services possible, and the best pharmacists ensuring I get the drugs I need. I would feel safe asking and demaning this because I would not be paying for it.”
For Women: 1st kid out of wedlock, WIC, then daycare, welfare, and job training. 2nd kid out of wedlock, mandatory tubes tied to recieve benefits. No benefits for subsequent pregnancies.
For Men: Failing to either marry the “baby mama” and maintain a joint household or maintain child support payments = jail time or a $3000 payment to recieve a free vasectomy. $1000 cash payment for convicted felons to recieve free vasectomy. Mandatory jail time for <1 bastards sired. (jail time waived upon recieving vasectomy)
For both sexes: If rules for benefits are broken, local food banks will provide 1 weeks worth of rice and beans, multivitamins, water, bread, cheese, and fruit/vegetable juice per individual and dependants per week. No more WIC debit cards, you show up and wait in line to get your food boxes. Arpaio type yurt/tent cities provided for homeless. Modern ID technology (biometrics) used to verify each recipient, including citizenship status and to prevent multiple ID’s. Mandatory drug testing after 1 year on public assistance. Congress passes laws to end anchor baby citizenship and to prevent illegals from recieving govt benefits. Impeach any judge that throws either law out. (yes that includes SCOTUS)
Costs for HHS will fall like a rock. Illegal immigration will mostly end. Then a sensible LEGAL immigration system can start replacing population loss with people that actually have skills and WANT to become Americans.
THEY COULD HAVE CHOSEN ABSTINENCE!