People who possess a quality have no need to mock or deride others who do not (in appearance or actuality) possess that quality.
Patient men, for instance, feel no need to mock the impatient. But one can find plenty of examples the inverse occurring.
Wise men do not need to mock fools, but one can find plenty of examples of fools mocking the wise.
People who themselves feel no need to “compensate” for physical attributes don’t mock others on account of the mocker’s suspicion that the victim of mockery owns a car or dog or (insert object) for the purpose of “compensating” for said physical attributes.
It doesn’t occur to them; it’s not within them to do so.
So when a Freeper does so, repeatedly-—well, that gets my attention. Undoubtedly, it’s gotten the attention of others.
And it says much more about him than it does those whom he attempts to mock.
“So when a Freeper does so, repeatedly-—well, that gets my attention.”
And that somehow makes it imperative for you to put in your two cents when no criticism was of you was directed or implied.
But you have a good day. Over and out.