Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaNew
All legal entities -- legislatures, courts, etc. are bound in law by what the Founder's called "We Hold these Truths to be self-evident".

There are absolutes. Proverbs puts it thus "Remove not the old landmark; and enter not into the fields of the fatherless".

The old landmarks include the basic -- self-evident to the Founder's generations -- definitions of marriage, of murder, of life, of WHO IS A MAN. Justice Tanney busted down that last old landmark, and as a consequence a most bloody civil war ensued.

A state can place some constraints on what constitutes a legally recognizable marriage, or define categories of murder. But there are some limits to the ability to redefine basic concepts and terms of law.

The modern folly of redefining marriage is as bad or worse than what Justice Tanney once did.

679 posted on 08/11/2011 7:41:11 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies ]


To: bvw

Well, I think marriage is a states issue. I don’t think the U. S. Constitution permits the federal government to meddle with marriage.


768 posted on 08/11/2011 7:49:22 PM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson