I agree that the submission question needed to be asked. It’s very relevant to the idea of a woman being president. Did she answer well. I’d give her a B. She explained within the context of their marriage, but she did not relate her answer to holding the office of Pres. She needed to have made that clearer. Would another woman, say Hillary Clinton, be asked that? No. But we conservatives live our values, that is why these questions come about, and why they must be answered properly. She did okay, IMHO. Rick S. was much clearer and firmer on the values issues. Cain as well. Both grew in my esteem. Newt has great political wisdom but not much in the morals area. I can’t get past that. Others candidates? What others? Rick Perry was a cheerleader for Texas A&M. Not sure that’s an erasable image for me.
I still think that Michele answered the question well, and I know that Sarah would have too, if it were asked of her.
The left doesn't understand willing submission in marriage, first to the Lord, then to each other, but they got a chance to hear about it, possibly for the first time last night.
I agree that Rick was clearer and firmer on values issues, and I was impressed by him last night, and I agree that Cain was strong, and that Newt is bright, but has crossed the ideological divide too often and the moral divide.....well, even once is too much for me.