Sarah Palin (not by her fault)has been considered a candidate for 2012 since before 2010. These candidates (most of which I do not like) are improving their debating skills with every debate that happens. If Palin were actually running it would appear to the voters that Palin may be avoiding the debates to minimize committing gaffes.
Me, I would love to see a President Palin. Her proposals are exactly what America needs. I'd vote for her in a second.
But what concerns me is that (if she's planning on running) she's not taking advantage of the debates to get her agenda known and also to improve her debating skills.
It's kind of like the rabbit and turtle story. If you know about that, you cannot possibly disagree with me.
Okay. Point taken. So you are not in the no Palin at any cost catagory. I will disagree that these *debates* were debates though. They were katie couric interviews on steroids. Sarah has honed her skills by talking with real people on the ground everywhere she goes. She silenced the union goons in Wisconsin on their own turf by looking them straight in the eye and telling them the truth about themselves. I’m convinced.