Replies

So, I fail in logic because I’m saying that Sarah might not become a candidate.

What kind of logic school did you go to?

Ok...

Let me be logical...

Sarah is still weighing her chances and determining whether she should jump into the race, but, she’ll first need to consult with her family about whether they’re willing to go through the gruesome next 18 months or so.

Is that better?

Let me continue being logical...

She has very good chances to win the nomination and the presidency.

BTW, I do believe that she would be the best candidate for the presidency on the republican side.

Now, let me go back to being illogical...

Until she gives any signs that she is even thinking of running, I’ll continue believing that she’s not running.

Now, back to being logical...

I have been one of the most ardent defenders of Palin and everything she represents for our side, both here an in other forums. I don’t believe that anybody can beat her.

Now, back to bad logic...

As of now, she’s not running, and there are other candidates who could beat her out for the nomination.

Now, back to your preferred logic...

As far as I’m concerned, there is no other candidate who could do better against Obama than Palin.

***********************************************************

BTW, I wholeheartedly believe that last sentence. She would utterly destroy Obama and the democrats.

Look, the way I see it, it’s not a matter of logic or no logic. It’s a matter of noticing that she hasn’t even approached the subject in any serious way since the other republicans started their campaigns. Of course, it’s still early, but, sometimes, entering later doesn’t overcome the “lead” and following that others might have developed.

Anyhow, if she does enter the race, I’ll be behind her 100%. Is that better now? Am I logical now?