Oh, the quote game! How fun!
What you are saying is farcical
You have no idea what you are talking about
You speak like the kind of zealot that has killed people
, I suggest you learn to recognize your own vast ignorance
Unlike you I know the subject
I recognize the complexities and difficulties of these matters. You do not
your ignorance is dangerous
And the point of this all is?
you know nothing about the kind of cancer I had
Might I point out that this is not about you? It is about recombinant DNA. Or did you have recombinant DNA therapy and did not mention that?
I am sorry that you got cancer, sorry that there was no other way than surgery and radiation, a treatment scenario that is barbaric at best. Bravo to you to for sticking with it, that is one tough road to hoe.
But, I was not writing to you, but to others that may not have done their homework like you said you did.
However I for one do not find your abuse enchanting. Had you had breast cancer or leukemia, would you have been happy to find that there is working alternatives according to studies? Or would you have pissed on me for that too? One would think I stepped on your favorite kitten the way you reacted.
No biggie, one nice thing about this world, its not all your way or the highway. Others can have opinions too, no matter how dangerous it all seems to you. Hope your cancer does not come back, I do suggest you look into the fungal link with cancer, you might have missed that point. A little anti-fungal diet change just might save or create on less cancer death in the future. ( now dont get all irritated, if its good enough for the president, I can use it too..)
Goodbye. Have a nice life.
sorry, you're the one who spoke, repeatedly, in wild generalities about "cancer" and "poison" and "carcinogens" of chemo and radiation, and of a doctor who wants to "cut you up".... and you're the one who was using the 2nd person "you" to me as though you had something to say about my experiences with cancer and treatment.
You can pretend now that it was not your slovenly language that gave rise to these misunderstandings, but I suggest you learn to speak/write accurately and with a pretense of precision. If you did not mean to speak of all 200+ types of "cancer" then you should have used some specification of what you were talking about. If you did not mean to speak of what I went through (about which you know nothing) then you should not have repeatedly used the word "you" in speaking so dismissively. There is nothing of value I have learned from you in this exchange, and I did not appreciate your patronizing attitudes and vast over-generalizations. I still don't.
a few examples of your mis-statements from which you now seem to retreat:
What you do with it is up to you. Google is your friend..... Strange, when pointed to a change in lifestyle that could be linked to cancer you prefer poison, and surgery and want everyone else to go that way too. very strange.... To take the word of a Doctor that says they want to cut you up but don't know what cancer is or what causes it vs finding a Doctor that at least thinks they understand the cause of the issue is difficult to understand.
as I've said, none of these words/thoughts of yours have anything to do with me, since they (1) do not apply to my case or experiences, and (2) despite your repetitions of the word "you" they must apply only to some mysterious episode you are imagining somewhere else. I did research my case extensively, took without question the best courses of treatment which have been successful for 9 years, and did not have any possible "lifestyle" issues that had anything to do with my cancer. So it's your careless language which gave rise to these misunderstandings.