Paul lashes out at fellow Texan Perry

Foxnews ^ | August, 10 2011

[rideharddiefast]

You can tell much about a candidate by the company they keep. Paul gets the endorsement of strong Tea Party backers, McKinney, Sheehan and Juan Williams. More proof that he is the surely the true Tea Party candidate.

[John D]

So you are proud of a blame America first, pro-drug, pro-gay anti-military tithe who blames America for 9/11? Why doesn't he run on the Cindy Sheehan/Cynthia McKinney Ticket? He has much more in common with them than any real Republican.

[Sarabaracuda]

John Edwards?

[jpsb]

I think with the nation over 16 trillion in debt that maybe it time to stop spending trillions of dollars and thousand of lives trying to remake the world in our image. Might be that the money and lives are better spent here at home.

[tdscpa]

Please ignore my comment. Upon further review, I have decided I can not figure out what you are saying.

You seem to be pro Perry because Ron Paul hates him. I guess I got a little confused in trying to decipher your comment. I thought you were pro Ron Paul.

I will pay no attention to anything Ron Paul says. His opposition to anyone would not influence me in any way. He has to be the stupidest politician in the US who does not have a D. after his name.

I would need to have a better reason to support a presidential candidate.

I still can not think of a good reason to support Rick Perry. In my opinion, anyone who could support algore for president would be eliminated from consideration by me.

[John D]

I will pay no attention to anything Ron Paul says. His opposition to anyone would not influence me in any way. He has to be the stupidest politician in the US who does not have a D. after his name.

I disagree. He is the stupidest politician in the world. PERIOD.
The reason I dislike him so much is not that he is so stupid as much as that he blames America for every problem in the world, and wants to leave America defenseless against his terrorist friends.

[John D]

Who is trying to remake the world in our image? America is trying to protect itself from terrorists who want to destroy us. No matter how much you, cut and run, Cindy Sheehan, Cynthia McKinney and others of like belief want us to believe that if we just bow down to them and appease them more they will leave us alone they will not. Putting our heads in the sand will not make our enemies disappear.

[jpsb]

"Putting our heads in the sand will not make our enemies disappear."

17 trillion in debt, 4 wars and no lasting peace anywhere, revolution thur out the entire middle east enabling the Muslim Brotherhood way to go! I think your way, "nation building" wars, "winning the hearts and minds" is a complete disaster for the USA. Maybe it is time to rethink how and why of our idiotic forgien policy.

[John D]

America did not become the great nation it is by turning tail and running every time we were attacked. If you, the surrender monkey, or your two female heroes were in charge in 1812 America would have surrendered to the British and apologized for winning our freedom.
America became great by standing up for ourselves against our enemies. Not through appeasement and surrender. If we are afraid to protect ourselves the terrorists will strike again and again.
You sound like the parent of a kid who was the victim of bullies near here. They blame the school because they failed to teach their kid to stand up for himself. Terrorists like bullies only respect those who dare defend themselves. Terrorists and bullies prey on those cowards who would rather run than fight.
Cut and run and his supporters are the terrorists dream for America.

[tdscpa]

He is the stupidest politician in the world. PERIOD.(Ron Paul).

No way! Much smarter than obama, reid, peelousey, scummer, kerry, levin, leahy, hell, smarter than any federal senator or rep. with a d. in their description.

[John D]

If cut and run is so smart why can he NEVER get anything accomplished? Especially if the others are so stupid, but do get things accomplished? We may not like what they are accomplishing, but they are accomplishing something, the surrender monkey has never accomplished anything, except acquiring earmarks.

[jpsb]

Sadly, but not surprisingly, you are incapable of discussing our involvement in “nation building” wars that accomplishing nothing, save costing American tax payers trillions of dollars we have to borrow from our “good friends” the communist Chinese. I seems to me the only ones benefiting from our insane foreign policy are the Chicoms, the Iranians and extreme Islam. Not my idea of an affective foreign policy.

[John D]

America is great because we are strong. If we were not strong we would have been run over years ago. If you would rather live in a country that turns tail, runs and surrenders like France maybe you should live there. I would rather live in a country where we can be proud, and not afraid to stand up for what is right.
Bullies only respect those who are willing to stand up for themselves. If we are afraid to stand up for what is right the terrorists win.

[jpsb]

The strong America of which you speak was built by a people very reluctant to meddle in the affairs of other nations. You should read a little history and learn from it. If you did you would discover that in the past the nation was very slow to go to war and when it did go to war it utterly destroyed the enemy and broke the enemies will to fight by inflicting horrendous damage to his people and homeland.

Once we declared war, fought the war and won the war. We did not do never ending “nation building” wars. We did not do “police action” wars, we did not do “hearts and minds” wars. We did war wars.

Our current foreign policy is Wilsonian, which is to say progressive or leftest. No thinking conservative would ever support these no win idiotic wars that our progressive elected leaders have gotten us into. In the old days we did not "stand up to the bully" we smashed him into the dirt and then we killed him. Today we don't have the courage to fight a proper war demanding unconditional surrender and killing anyone or that dare stand between us and victory. The real surrender money is you, not me, you are fine sending our troops into wars they are not allowed to win, against enemies they are not allowed to name, with roles of engagement designed to keep their enemies safe. Well I say screw that.

[lonestar]

He actually was the chairman for Al Gore at one time not too many years ago."

Paul actually ran for POTUS on the Libertarian ticket making him the official RINO.

He has the same followers every campaign cycle.

Ron Paul is comic relief and nothing more.

Every party needs a Dennis Kucinich...Paul's it.

[TheThirdRuffian]

“In my opinion, anyone who could support algore for president would be eliminated from consideration by me.”

It is certaibly not a great thing.

That said, Michele Bachman was a huge Jimmy Carter supporter.

People change.