“Orly didn’t secure an order from Judge Puglisi. She filed a motion to show cause and to compel production of documents. The Judge set a date of Sept 14th for a hearing on whether or not he should grant (i.e. sign) Orly’s proposed motion to compel.”
The judge set a hearing for the purpose of allowing the bureaucrats to show cause. How can they show cause if they’re not there? You’re just playing with words to make it appear that WND said something they didn’t.
No.
He did not set a hearing for the bureaucrats to show cause. He set a hearing on Orly’s request. In that hearing, he will determine whether her request is granted (i.e., whether the court will proceed to actually asking the bureaucrats to show cause).
Her request will be denied.
Wrong.
The judge did not issue an order to show cause. In fact, he didn’t issue any order. He set a hearing to consider Orly’s Motion to Compel.