[BuckeyeTexan]

You said: "The judge set a hearing for the purpose of allowing the bureaucrats to show cause. How can they show cause if they’re not there? You’re just playing with words to make it appear that WND said something they didn’t."

The hearing is not for the DoH to show cause. The hearing is to consider whether or not to grant Orly's Motion to Compel. There's a significant difference between the two. Neither WND nor Orly understands that, as evidenced by the absurd title Court tells Hawaii officials to explain Obama's birth records. The court didn't tell the DoH to do anything and certainly isn't telling them to explain birth records at the upcoming hearing.

[dsc]

“The court didn’t tell the DoH to do anything and certainly isn’t telling them to explain birth records at the upcoming hearing.”

Ah. So, a motion to compel them to produce said records, against which I would think they would argue, has absolutely nothing to do with explaining those records.

Not with explaining why they shouldn’t be ordered to produce them, nor with demonstrating that the “birthers” are nutty by producing the documents, nor with explaining why they can’t produce them if they are ordered to...

No connection to any of those things.

Got it.