“The judge did not issue an order to show cause. In fact, he didn’t issue any order. He set a hearing to consider Orly’s Motion to Compel.”
That’s correct, with one quibble: The two docket entries of 08/08/2011 both direct the plaintiff to provide notice of hearing to other parties. That is a court order. The Court ordered Orly Taitz to notify Loretta Fuddy and all interested parties.
There’s an interesting difference between the two orders to provide notice. The first docket entry orders Taitz, “to provide notice of the hearing to Loretta Fuddy, Health Department, State of Hawaii”. The second orders her, “to provide notice of the hearing to be set to all interested parties”. Courts take a dim view of excluding interested parties.
Agreed.