1. One of the litigants, most often Orly, comes up with some hair-brained court submittal whose inevitable failure any competent attorney can predict and explain.
2. It gets hyped and the true believes swallow the latest holy writ hook, line and sinker. The more frisky ones actually find legal text and rulings to cut-and-paste for maximum misunderstanding.
3. Any informed observer who points out that it's all based on a misunderstanding of the law and can't succeed is an O-bot.
4. The case goes down in flames without the slightest hint the court in question regards it as anything but a pointless nuisance.
5. The fact of the hopelessly stupid case going down in flames becomes proof of how massive and sinister the conspiracy is.
6. The true believers clap for Tinkerbelle even harder.
Lather, rinse, and repeat.
Larry Klayman, Bev Harris and Orly Taitz.
You forgot
2a. The judge, whoever it is, is hailed as a true American patriot who won’t be intimidated and will finally exposed the truth.
Followed by
5a. That same judge is vilified as an Obot traitor and coward.
When Taitz encounters yet another roadblock, birthers will immediately include Judge Puglisi in their list of people “gotten to”. It's only a matter of time.
I wonder how much taxpayer money Orly has wasted on her nonsense. I also wonder how many cases with merit have been delayed because of the court's time she has wasted.
Orly's experience seems to be a pretty good indication that the hurdle for getting cases heard in court is waaaaay too low, and that the system lacks sufficient ability to just throw nonsense cases out. Or perhaps the sanctions and penalties for wasting the court's time with nonsense are too low.
Your thoughts?