To: KeyLargo
Never forget that this was not just Obama’s bill. This was Bohners bill as well. Forgetting that would make us hypocrites.
37 posted on
08/06/2011 9:34:06 AM PDT by
Revel
To: Revel
>>Never forget that this was not just Obamas bill. This was Bohners bill as well. Forgetting that would make us hypocrites.<<
Im thinking the claim that he got 98% of what they wanted is not going to be repeated. Nor will claims of winning by the TEA party.
To: Revel
This was Reid's bill.The dems turned down the bill that would have done what the S&P was looking to be done.I am not saying anyone is excempt. They are all a ponzi scheme minus a handful and the tea party. But If Reid's/Obama’s bill were not passed we would have taken a worse hit and then the GOP would have owned it. Obama owns this. It is all an insane mess but the dems lies of raising taxes and pushing granny off a cliff no longer work, you see.
39 posted on
08/06/2011 9:46:37 AM PDT by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(It is possible to both promote Palin and support Bachmann at the same time, ya know.)
To: Revel
Hey in the end Obama had final say, he could have vetoed it, so it lays firmly and squarely at his door.
42 posted on
08/06/2011 9:47:14 AM PDT by
sunmars
To: Revel
No, Boehner’s bill was Cut, Cap, BBAmmendment. This one had the fingerprints of Reid, Obama, McConell.
44 posted on
08/06/2011 9:48:43 AM PDT by
expatpat
To: Revel
45 posted on
08/06/2011 9:49:58 AM PDT by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(It is possible to both promote Palin and support Bachmann at the same time, ya know.)
To: Revel
46 posted on
08/06/2011 9:54:59 AM PDT by
Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
(It is possible to both promote Palin and support Bachmann at the same time, ya know.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson