Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ctdonath2

100% taxation would bring in $0 to the revenue because there would be no legal economic activity taking place at that point


72 posted on 08/04/2011 10:39:44 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

In a short post methinks it unnecessary to state the obvious. The 100% rate is of course a hypothetical, intended to identify the outer limits of taxation potential. Leftists forget that there IS a limit to taxation, and to how much “the rich” could be soaked for; they argue as though “eliminating the Bush tax cuts for the rich” would be enough to resolve the deficit and debt, yet my latest number crunching and SWAGs conclude “soak the rich” would max out net revenue increases around $150B.

Yes, a 100% tax rate would net $0. Even stupidly not taking into account human nature, “soak the rich” has limits far lower than Leftists presume.


75 posted on 08/05/2011 3:55:11 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson