Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Liz
This is why he's screwed IMO:
"....that were intended only for her eyes..."
'Intend' is not 'explicit'.

Now if he can produce a verified email that says 'For Your Eyes Only', then he 'may' have something.

47 posted on 08/03/2011 9:41:11 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits [A.Einstein])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Condor51
Try to remember "he was asked for the photos" by an online blogger who was purportedly interested in him.....might even have been a female (snigger).

He wasn’t a "predator" or "acting in a predatory manner" (/snix).

It “felt right” for him to expose his genitals publicly--that’s all that matters. He was just doing “what’s right for him.”

If he "feels" that he wants to expose his private parts, no big deal.

Heck, if he “feels its right for him” to attend a Freeholder meeting in the nude, who are we to interfere with his “feelings“?

=======================================

Let me hasten to add to all the airheads out there with "feelings:" A world-class republic is not governed by “feelings.” The rule of law prevails.

50 posted on 08/03/2011 10:03:01 AM PDT by Liz ( A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson