Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On Heels of Debt Deal, Obama Meets with Union Leaders at White House
CNS News ^ | 8/2/2011 | Fred Lucas

Posted on 08/02/2011 3:57:36 PM PDT by IbJensen

(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama was meeting with union leaders at the White House Tuesday morning, part of an effort to retain organized labor’s support going into the 2012 election.

A meeting with the AFL-CIO Executive Committee at 9:15 a.m. was the first item listed on Obama’s public schedule for Tuesday. The meeting is closed to the press.

Many liberals in the Democrat Party are criticizing the debt limit legislation Obama has pledged to sign. The AFL-CIO, along with other unions, wanted the deal to include the elimination of tax breaks for wealthy Americans, but Republicans nixed that provision.

AFSCME, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, called the compromise debt-ceiling deal “economic malpractice.”

“At the least, it will slow economic recovery and impose more joblessness, wage cuts and hardship on America’s working families,” AFSCME President Gerald W. McEntee said in a statement on the union’s Web site. He accused the tea party of holding the nation “hostage.”

“Looking ahead to the negotiations in the ‘super committee,’ we will fight alongside our friends in Congress and with the President to ensure that the ultimate resolution creates rather than destroys jobs, and does not gut vital programs, such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, in order to preserve tax breaks for the wealthy and prosperous corporations,” McEntee said.

(The debt limit bill calls for a 12-member congressional committee, half Democrats and half Republicans, to find additional deficit reduction measures, and the elimination of tax breaks for the wealthy may be part of the “revenue” side.)

On July 26, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka told a gathering of the organization in Las Vegas that organized labor should be tougher on Democrats.

“Our single job, our sole mission, our sole priority, is to represent the interests of men and women who work, who bring home wages—and to represent them honestly and fearlessly, every single day, with no caveats, no apologies,” Trumka said.

“A lot of people think that means we need to be harder on Democrats, and it does. President Obama and the Democrats have done a great deal—not enough—but a lot. Still, we need a lot more. And we will not be quiet about it.”

Like McEntee, Trumka views the tea party as the real enemy.

“We intend to hold everyone in public office accountable, regardless of their political party, and yet, brothers and sisters, let’s be crystal clear about who has consistently launched and relentlessly pursued attacks on working people,” Trumka said. “Tea party Republicans -- again and again and again -- have been a united front against us, against all working people in America, to do all the harm they can.”

The union lobby has traditionally be a big fundraiser for Democratic candidates.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: antipresident; evilregime; keynesianidiot
Researching reveals so much information on the Union ties to Communism and Trumka is head of the Communist Union.

SEIU and the others are right behind him. And then there is the 'so called leader' of the free world. Interesting how many communists his name is affiliated with like Bill Ayers and his wife and then Andy Stern the top White House visitor.

1 posted on 08/02/2011 3:57:48 PM PDT by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Trumka said. “Tea party Republicans -- again and again and again -- have been a united front against us, against all working people in America, to do all the harm they can.”

Textbook example of "projection"

If Trumka has got his panties in a twist about the Tea party....we are turning the tide.

2 posted on 08/02/2011 4:06:37 PM PDT by Popman (Obama. First Marxist to turn a five year Marxist plan into a 4 year administration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen; All

I’ll bet that the UAW just ready to enter wage negotiations with Ford will not be pleased that the CEO is getting $58 million, while the auto workers are bargaining for something between $50 and $58 thousand a year. That is a 1,000 to one pay ratio. A far cry from the 40 to 1 major CEO to low level worker ratio that existed at the start of the Reagan Administration. I wonder how much the stockholders are loosing from such extreme upper management pay levels in many industries.


3 posted on 08/02/2011 4:06:56 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Campaigning at the White Crib? Tsk tsk tsk....


4 posted on 08/02/2011 4:11:38 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin
The upper management had the foresight to obtain a line of credit that allowed Ford to avoid the fate of GM and Chrysler. GM stockholders (and even bond holders) got nothing in the Obama/UAW deal. Combine that with Ford's profits and I bet that the stockholders are perfectly happy with the company's upper management. Perhaps if GM had paid what it took to hire Alan Mullaly, they would not be owned by Obama and the UAW.
5 posted on 08/02/2011 4:27:12 PM PDT by RightOnTheBorder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson