Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GreaterSwiss

Seems to me to be unconstitutional, both because we outlaw have Bills of Attainder and because all persons in congress get equal representation.


50 posted on 08/02/2011 12:28:28 PM PDT by CodeToad (Islam needs to be banned in the US and treated as a criminal enterprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

I think this cannot pass the legality test just like you do but then again, we have an asshat in the oval office who believes the Constitution needs be changed to enumerate what the government should do for you....fine...first amendment, go away.


72 posted on 08/02/2011 1:08:24 PM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

It’s not a “Bill of Attainder”.
It’s just giving appointment power to those who are biased.

It’s not saying “Tea Partiers are denied participation.”
It’s just saying “those who don’t like Tea Partiers choose the players.”


84 posted on 08/02/2011 1:35:49 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson