Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP rallies around Boehner on deal
Politico ^ | 7/31/11 | JAKE SHERMAN & JONATHAN ALLEN

Posted on 07/31/2011 11:33:36 PM PDT by Rabin

Edited on 08/01/2011 8:38:33 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last
To: cc2k
Until that changes, a "third party" is doomed. Better to reclaim and reform the Republican party.
And if the Republicans nominate Mitt or someone just as bad in 2012? Just go with the flow again? We tried that in 2008 with McLame and where did that get us? And if Mitt should actually win? My God, that would mean 8 more years (at least) of RINOs in charge. NO, we need to draw the line in the sand now. I would rather lose with Sarah or Michelle running third party than "win" with Mitt. At least that would give us a lot stronger start to taking state houses, state legislatures, etc. if people knew we were serious. We will take the White House faster that way than if we keep supporting these milquetoast candidates.
61 posted on 08/01/2011 3:46:49 AM PDT by conservaterian (Sarah/DeMint '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sporke

An astute observation. Having to rely on the +/- 20% of voters who give no thught whatsoever to to matters political is not necessarily a recipe for resounding victory.


62 posted on 08/01/2011 3:48:53 AM PDT by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Rabin; holdonnow

Patting each other on the back...


63 posted on 08/01/2011 3:59:04 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
You are just wrong.

Allowing government and its debt to grow massively for another two years insures that the Republicans will have to make even MORE DRACONIAN CUTS if they take control of Congress and White House in 2013.

If the Republican party will be destroyed by administering pain, better it be destroyed RIGHT NOW when there is a chance to save the country.

If the country is destroyed by financial failure, neither major party will be worth a nickel.

There is no middle ground on insolvency.

You stop spending and borrowing immediately when you are this far into massive debt.

What this deal does is acknowledge to the world the problem is insurmountable and virtually assures a violent upheaval in this country when the American financial system inevitably collapses.

Extremely painful cuts need to be made RIGHT NOW to even have a chance to save this country.

Putting off massive cuts for another day continues the same irresponsible behavior by American congresses for the past 75 years.

This deal represents a failure of the American experiment. This is a people who cannot responsibly govern themselves. This is a people living in a fairy-tale-world that is quickly becoming their worst nightmare.

64 posted on 08/01/2011 4:01:54 AM PDT by NoControllingLegalAuthority (Where is the middle ground on insolvency of the United States government?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
I agree with you. The situation was precarious and the mass media was in full force blaming the Republicans. If this had played out much longer we were clearly going to lose the support of independents. I was afraid it was going to be 1996 all over again with the GOP overplaying their hand and helping a democrat President win reelection.

By making this deal, the GOP can redirect the attention to jobs and this ailing economy, Obama’s primary areas of weakness with voters.

65 posted on 08/01/2011 5:07:25 AM PDT by Blackandproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
I think I’m the only one on FR not upset. I never thought it would or could end another way...we simply don’t have the numbers. 2012 is our chance to make a difference and we should be going after Democrats then; we need a Senate majority and a new president - that must be our focus.

Agreed. When 60% of America pays no attention to politics, 98% of the media carries the water of the liberals, and the demonRATS control the senate and white hut we got all we could.

President Palin will kick their ass.

66 posted on 08/01/2011 5:10:28 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
You are not alone. It may seem that way on this forum which is dominated by kamikaze hot heads who would rather be ‘right’ than affective in politics.
67 posted on 08/01/2011 5:53:39 AM PDT by Buffalo Head (Illigitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51

You’ve heard the expression, “starving the beast”?

With no new sources of revenue this is what has happened. For the libs to attempt to increase spending again with this issue front and center in the public eye would sound the death knell for them, even with the media carrying their water.


68 posted on 08/01/2011 5:56:10 AM PDT by 101voodoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Rabin
For anyone who missed it....

America's Ruling Class -- And the Perils of Revolution By Angelo M. Codevilla

69 posted on 08/01/2011 5:57:30 AM PDT by mewzilla (Forget a third party. We need a second one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Same here....it was always going to get done. There was NEVER a question of that. Republicans just had to make the deal to not raise taxes etc. Which appears they did.


70 posted on 08/01/2011 6:00:35 AM PDT by shield (Rev 2:9 "Woe unto those who say they are Judahites and are not, but are of the syna GOG ue of Satan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: americanophile
Agree. This is not surrender. In fact is it a huge PR win for the GOP, one we sorely needed.

The deal isn't great, but considering we only control one house; our goal should be singular - 2012 - get the White House, the Senate and keep the House.

Over the past 2 weeks, The One with the enabling press have had the upper hand, IMHO. We were painted as the obstructionists (even though only we had the courage to put forth plan after plan to silence from the Dems.)

Only in the last day or two has the tide turned where the GOP held together and got most of what they want FOR NOW. No new taxes; another shot at $1.2T in cuts later this year; avert being labeled the “party of No” (Nancy might get that name if she blocks the deal). Possibility of voting on BBA.

We need public opinion on our side for 2012. We need the White House to control the Supreme Court. We need the White House to stop the bleeding and reverse Obamacare. We need to address entitlements - the core of our welfare society.

No other scenario on the debt crisis would have delivered this. Maybe we could have shut down the government for a couple of weeks, but we could have never scored a PR success like this deal. Even the libs on the radio are comparing Obama’s speech last night to Carter. Doesn't get much better.

Sure, would have preferred something stronger, but with this President, Harry Reid and an adoring press, it was just not meant to be. Good job Boehner and McConnell.

71 posted on 08/01/2011 6:29:06 AM PDT by dan on the right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dan on the right
No new taxes; another shot at $1.2T in cuts later this year; avert being labeled the “party of No”

Right. And automatic spending cuts (no new taxes) if the committee can't agree. The GOP got a good deal, and the Tea Party people were a big help. No doubt about it. We got the best deal possible and the whole debate has left Obama looking pretty feckless.

I agree that it was good work by the House GOP.

72 posted on 08/01/2011 6:41:25 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: americanophile; Rabin; GeronL; Psalm 144; UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I think I’m the only one on FR not upset.................. 2012 is our chance to make a difference and we should be going after Democrats then

I agree with you. This was probably as good a deal as we could get. We did not budge on taxes! Republicans only control half of one branch of government. The main advantage we had is that budget and tax bills must originate in the house (the only thing we control).

I'm going to call my new congressman's office to support his position on this plan. I remember the 1995 government shutdown, and it didn't do anything to help Republicans beat Clinton in 1996, so we got 4 more years of Clinton.

73 posted on 08/01/2011 6:47:13 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Please do not spam me with your platitudes and excuses for the the plantation Republicans. Take your pom-poms and go.


74 posted on 08/01/2011 6:57:52 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

I’ll agree but one had hope. The fact it is mostly all the idiots who we knew were bad at least 5 years ago. Couldn’t beat McCain. Couldn’t get Christine O’Donnell and Sharron Angle and that Guy in Washington State elected. Didn’t win Senate and the Pubs in the senate other than a very few are nuts.


75 posted on 08/01/2011 7:01:17 AM PDT by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BobP
One thing I'm not seeing or hearing discussed is the apparent deal made to allow the Bush tax cuts expire.

Obama WILL get his tax increases with or without being included in this deal.

This is all smoke and mirrors. This deal will do absolutely nothing to control spending in Washington.

By the end of O-bozo’s term, the national debt will be close to 20 trillion. This is a debt cutting deal?

We are being snookered once again. Senators, Reps, the White House and the MSM are trumping this up as if it were the deal of the century.

I hope the house drags this to a screeching halt.

76 posted on 08/01/2011 7:01:27 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

THere was the “NEW DEAL”, the “FAIR DEAL” and the “BIG F*CKING DEAL”.

I’m for the “NO DEAL”. House veto. Obame, figure it out what 40% to cut and trash him if he picks wrong.

At most, the House could have split the difference: Give Obama half the borrowing in monthly installments through 2012 and let him defund 20% of the government, repeal ObamaCare and extend the Bush tax cuts permanently, take it or leave it. It would have been a brilliant learning experience for everyone.


77 posted on 08/01/2011 7:22:53 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144
The GOP press conference on this "deal" ...

"Fiscal responsibility in our time!"

78 posted on 08/01/2011 7:30:19 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The only thing still propping up the GOP is the dwindling illusion that it's at all conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

I’m for the “NO DEAL”. House veto.

*************************

Agreed. Then immediately present a more austere bill than originally submitted, that does away with all funding for NPR or the NEA, as examples. Rinse and repeat as needed. Kill a leftwing sacred cow with each amended plan until they cave.


79 posted on 08/01/2011 7:32:46 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
No surprise the third party pimps around here are in hysteric mode today.

You are not going to undo 100 years of Progressive politics with a single vote.

This is a battle in a much larger, longer war.

This is what is wrong with too many supposed "Conservatives". You are so use to screaming and whining about everything you are incapable of doing anything else. You think of Politics as sport. It is not. It is war.

You Internet Conservatives think that there is either absolute victory, or absolute defeat and nothing in between.

US Politics doesn't work that way. Our Founders designed a system that is evolutionary, not revolutionary, in it's working. You are NEVER going to win one grand annihilating victory that forever changes everything to be exactly what you feel it should be. Our political system is specifically designed to prevent such events.

So instead of looking for some titanic great victory and then being pissed when you don't get it, learn to take your victories as they come and start on the next battle.

80 posted on 08/01/2011 7:32:58 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving politicians more tax money is like giving addicts free drugs to cure their addiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson