[KrisKrinkle]

“Do you not see that?”

For the sake of argument if nothing else: No.

Please explain.

[Flycatcher]

Simply put, if (as you say) "no one has to recognize a marriage if they choose not to" then it follows that no one has to recognize the meaning of the word "marriage" either.

This is the essence of the homosexualist agenda: there are no moral absolutes. In fact, to them, there are no absolutes at all.

And as I stated earlier, it is just this sort of squishy, soft-headed idealism that allows relativists to steal the word "marriage" and redefine it.

Relativism is the cancer of the modern age.