Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: llandres
I was a fan of term limits but CA approved term limits in 1990 and I can't say it's helped. It seems more of a draw.

CA Assembly members are limited to six years in office, 3 terms, and Senators to eight years in office, 2 terms. After that they are banned from that chamber for life.

Fourteen years in state legislative office seems like ample time but there are those who argue there's a problem with "institutional memory" in the CA legislature. I haven't read up on recent analyses but know they've been done.

406 posted on 07/31/2011 2:18:19 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Paul Ryan on Reid's bill: "Let's cover the moon with yogurt" http://post.ly/2gTED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey
"Fourteen years in state legislative office seems like ample time but there are those who argue there's a problem with "institutional memory" in the CA legislature. I haven't read up on recent analyses but know they've been done."

Hey if you ever do a study on that or just collect some links ping me please.

420 posted on 07/31/2011 5:16:40 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

To: newzjunkey

Well, I’m for letting each state decide where their state legislators are concerned.

But I’m talking about FEDERAL term limits on congressmen and senators. How different things might be if there could be no more career politicians. I’d propose 4 years for both houses, limited to 2, no more than 3, terms.


451 posted on 07/31/2011 8:28:29 AM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson