Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Recovering_Democrat
The problem with this analysis is that the effects attributed to freely available porn have been known and recognized as part of the sexual drive for decades before porn was much of an option.

Sex involves a balance of libido and aggression. Highly aggressive men, such as those driven to seek power, are likely to have sexual preferences colored by aggression more than the average. It has always been thus. And it has been noted by psychological observers for many years that as time passes, sexuality becomes more dominated by aggression at the expense of libido.

What is important about porn is that it allows the free flow of aggression into the sexual drive in the absence of a love object evoking the balancing effects of attachment and love. It accelerates the objectification of the sexual image and essentially turns the woman into a fetish instead of a person.

17 posted on 07/30/2011 7:34:20 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: hinckley buzzard

The problem with porn is that it is at it’s roots, gay.

It is the heterosexual equivalent of the gay lifestyle. Totally non-committal sex with strangers is the lifestyle being pushed. Total self-centeredness, narcissistic, and certainly nothing to do with kids wanting to be created.

Porn pushes the gay lifestyle onto heterosexuals. No committment, no strings, no long term anything, no consequences, no kids. No shame.


74 posted on 07/30/2011 11:13:40 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson