Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SteveH

Gee, didn’t the bit O teach constitutional law in Chicago?? He can’t figure this out for himself??? I believe if he tries this, he oversteps his bounds. And I’m just a little ol’ housewife and I can figure that one out!!


10 posted on 07/30/2011 1:57:55 PM PDT by hstacey (Army Mom...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hstacey

Gee, didn’t the bit O teach constitutional law in Chicago??

***************************************

“Con Law”, as it is so appropriately named in the syllabus of all U.S. law schools, is a review of the historical means and techniques to circumvent, dismember, or remove the context of Constitutional excerpts. It is not a presentation of the Constitution as an organic whole or its plain meaning on its face. When the true exposition of the Constitution was given up entirely I do not know, but the corruption of it began in 1803.

The Declaration of Independence is not mentioned at all, except with dismissal or in whispers.


20 posted on 07/30/2011 2:11:27 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (Voodoo Republicans: Don't read their lips - watch their hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson