Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KittenClaws

I wouldn’t have a problem with a reduction in the stipend. I don’t want a stipend to be tied to the number, because that’s essentially population control. All the children should receive the same amount.


38 posted on 07/29/2011 9:36:25 AM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: BenKenobi
I wouldn’t have a problem with a reduction in the stipend. I don’t want a stipend to be tied to the number, because that’s essentially population control. All the children should receive the same amount.

Yes, all children should receive the same amount: ZERO!

When Joe and Jane worker have a baby, they must live within their means - their current salaries.

Same with Joe and Jane deadbeat, who both receive X amount because they are "poor". Having a child should not raise their initial draw by one red cent. They should live within the means that Joe and Jane worker are providing for them.

39 posted on 07/29/2011 9:50:29 AM PDT by KittenClaws (A closed mouth gathers no foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson