Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Texan's Answer to Welfare
Waco Herald Tribute ^ | Nov. 18, 2010 | Anon

Posted on 07/29/2011 7:37:42 AM PDT by econjack

Put me in charge . . .

Put me in charge of food stamps. I'd get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho's, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I'd do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we'll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine and document all tattoos and piercings. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, smoke or get tats and piercings, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your "home" will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a "government" job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the common good.

Before you write that I've violated someone's rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules.. Before you say that this would be "demeaning" and ruin their "self esteem," consider that it wasn't that long ago that taking someone else's money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people's mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND While you are on Govt subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Govt welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: KittenClaws

I’d rather eliminate welfare altogether.


41 posted on 07/29/2011 10:09:03 AM PDT by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

I agree.

Benevolence should be left up to the Churches and private individuals who would donate to the cause of the poor.


42 posted on 07/29/2011 10:59:34 AM PDT by KittenClaws (A closed mouth gathers no foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BenKenobi

Obviously their parents aren’t responsible either, so let’s give them to parents that are responsible.

I work with St. Vincent de Paul society in our area as well as other private charitable groups so I’m far from heartless. Leaving children in a situation like that is not charitable.

Please see my tagline.


43 posted on 07/29/2011 1:43:21 PM PDT by wordsofearnest (Proper aim of giving is to put the recipient in a state where he no longer needs it. C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson