The rules say that "The clerk must issue a subpoena, signed but otherwise in blank, to a party who requests it. That party must complete it before service." You can even download the subpoena form from the Hawaii District Court website. There's no real reason to think a judge ever saw this one.
As far as I've been able to tell (by asking lawyers), when the Hawaii DOH says "No, thanks" to Orly & Co., she can then ask the judge for a motion to compel them to comply. In turn, they could ask for a motion to quash. Etc., etc. The upshot is, I'm pretty sure she's a long way from getting to see anything.
Why on earth should she be a long way from getting anything??? HI has nothing to hide, right? Everything is in perfect order, right? Why wouldn’t HI comply to, as Abercrombie vowed to [and failed epically] ‘put the issue to rest’???