Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Democrats Promise to Reject Boehner Plan
NY Times ^ | July 27, 2011 | MICHAEL D. SHEAR

Posted on 07/28/2011 10:55:40 AM PDT by CharlyFord

Fifty-three Democratic senators have signed a letter to House Speaker John A. Boehner saying they intend to vote against his plan for an increase in the debt ceiling, virtually assuring its defeat in the Senate even as the speaker lines up Republican votes to pass it in the House on Thursday.

Votes are not final until they are cast. But if the Democrats hold to their promise in the letter, Mr. Boehner’s plan for a six-month increase in borrowing authority will not make it to President Obama’s desk.

(Excerpt) Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: boehnerplan; budget; democrats; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: I cannot think of a name

We have 47 GOP senators and yes, they will play hardball. All voted for CCB and all will support Boehner.

Wait a day or so for the news to shift to the senate b4 we tell the American people what we think of Harry Reid and his plan.


21 posted on 07/28/2011 11:13:32 AM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Freezing the budget...

What budget? There hasn't been a "budget" for almost 900 days. If you accept the current rate of expenditures as a de facto budget you have just legitimized the highest spending rate in the history of the republic! It makes more sense to me to fall back to the last "real" budget (pre-obama).

Regards,
GtG

22 posted on 07/28/2011 11:20:10 AM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

THIS could/should be hung around the democrats neck LIKE A MILLSTONE...
The President has echoed this verbally several times..

A smart candidate would capitalize on this like “Ron Popiel”...

Elect Me as president just .. “Set it and forget it”..
I will go thru Washington D.C. like a vacuum cleaner..
I will clean up the place like heroic bowel irrigation..
Just give me a House and Senate to match...

I’ll flush the deficit, make the illegal aliens long for the Mexico, and/or use them to build “the WALL”, investigate the federal reserve, AND start burning all those fiat 20’s and 100’s Obama printed.. increasing the value of the dollar..


23 posted on 07/28/2011 11:24:09 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

SO What? The House should do their job in the House then send it to the Senate. If the fools don’t pass it, it’s on them.

I would also make sure that a copy of that letter with all of those signatures get posted everywhere so the public and the entire world can see who those idiots are.

Boehner needs to stop running around like a “chicken with it’s head cut off” trying to please the liberals. Do your job and keep pushing it. Harry Reid is nothing. Stop letting him scare you like he’s the boogeyman. Good grief!


24 posted on 07/28/2011 11:24:09 AM PDT by abcc2011 (Christian and conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord
The House Republicans need to borrow some of this nice lady's spunk! Tell the Senate to vote on the CCB bill! Stand up tp them!


25 posted on 07/28/2011 12:14:27 PM PDT by CharlyFord (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

file:///home/vernon/Desktop/Eat%20Your%20Own%20Damn%20Peas.JPG


26 posted on 07/28/2011 12:27:03 PM PDT by qman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Voting against it before they’ve even seen it. Who’s obstructionist now?


27 posted on 07/28/2011 12:32:30 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray
What budget? There hasn't been a "budget" for almost 900 days. If you accept the current rate of expenditures as a de facto budget you have just legitimized the highest spending rate in the history of the republic! It makes more sense to me to fall back to the last "real" budget (pre-obama).

The current rate of spending may not have been put down on paper or have signed approvals by all parties but, like it or not, it is indeed the de facto budget.

de fac·to:

adjective

1.Denoting someone or something that is such in fact
ie: - a de facto one-party system

adverb

1.In fact, whether by right or not
ie:- the island has been de facto divided into two countries

Falling back to a previous budget would be even better, but either benchmark is preferable to what seems to be coming down. The size of the reduction currently being discussed is so pitifully small it hardly seems to be worth all the effort.

To settle for such a small percentage in reduced spending is a major capitulation that hands Obama a win and will just inflate his bloated ego even more.


28 posted on 07/28/2011 12:47:59 PM PDT by Iron Munro (The more effeminate & debauched the people, the more they are fitted for a tyrannical government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CharlyFord

Despite the rubbish being floated in news reports, both the Republican and Democrat leadership know the rules they work under. They both know that revenue bills must originate in the House and the only avenue for Reid to have his plan considered is to take up a House passed bill and amend it. If he attempts to do so, he must get a two thirds majority which is very unlikely. If he allows a House passed bill to be taken up for consideration, he runs the real risk of not only failing to get his amendments passed, but having enough defections in his ranks to allow the unamended bill to be passed.

Reid has a very weak hand but he is good at bluffing and, unfortunately, republicans have a tendency to turn on their leadership when they don’t get everything the want. These are interesting times.


29 posted on 07/28/2011 2:34:23 PM PDT by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: etcb

You speak with much wisdom my friend.....a rare event here on FR!


30 posted on 07/28/2011 2:37:35 PM PDT by RVN Airplane Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787

“We have 47 GOP senators”

You have more faith in there also being 47 spines than I do. We’ve been sold down the river by the ‘Super’ Rinos before.


31 posted on 07/28/2011 2:42:11 PM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

all 47 remained firm with voting for (not to table) CCB.

You are underestimating McConnell.


32 posted on 07/28/2011 2:54:28 PM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
The current rate of spending may not have been put down on paper or have signed approvals by all parties but, like it or not, it is indeed the de facto budget.

I beg to differ with you on that point. Since a "budget" is a plan for future activities, simply writing down what you did does not meet the criteria of "planning for future activities". It is rather the antithesis of a budget in that it only records past activities. Perhaps we can agree to call it the "anti-budget"?

The only merit to be found in doing the budget "expos facto" is that you will most assuredly hit all of your targets, that being the inevitable result of drawing the bull's eye around the point the arrow struck!

Regards,
GtG

33 posted on 07/29/2011 11:14:15 AM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787

“You are underestimating McConnell.”

“Six Republicans joined Democrats to table the Boehner resolution were Sens. Jim DeMint (S.C.), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), Orrin Hatch (Utah), Mike Lee (Utah), Rand Paul (Ky.), and David Vitter (La.).”

Strange, not even the usual bunch of rino idiots!

I still remain very fearful of the Senate. Seems like we may actually have a sufficient quantity of spines in the House.


34 posted on 07/30/2011 11:03:11 AM PDT by I cannot think of a name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: I cannot think of a name

Calm down. McConnell released these 6 senators to vote NO on Boehner because it was not conservative enough for these senators.

Please see today’s news - 43 or the 47 GOP senators are holding firm w McConnell and will not vote for cloture on the Reid bill until Reid and Obama relent to GOP concessions.

What is delicious right now is that McConnell is running out the clock so the RATS cannot renege on a deal AND he is calling 0bama to the table and cutting REid out - just to piss Reid, schumer and durbin off.

Boehner and McConnell are coordinating beautifully.


35 posted on 07/30/2011 4:00:06 PM PDT by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson