Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

” Yes, it does. It states as its crowning purpose the protection of “Posterity.” Which of course not only includes the unborn, it includes those who are not even yet conceived. “ <<<

Posterity hinges on born individuals in the absence of a declaration of “personhood”. That is why the born individual was granted the privacy rights, which was the cornerstone argument for Roe v. Wade. I don’t mean to argue with your moral correctness, but Roe could not have passed had personhood been defined and then held precedents over privacy. Perhaps states could define personhood.


57 posted on 07/27/2011 7:59:24 PM PDT by RitaOK (We hang together or will hang separately. 2012, or bust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: RitaOK
Here's your definitive definition.
60 posted on 07/27/2011 8:03:07 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (For decades they've kicked the can down the road. Sorry, but there's no more road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson